Searched refs:term (Results 1 – 25 of 73) sorted by relevance
123
| /glibc-2.36/sysdeps/posix/ |
| D | isatty.c | 25 struct termios term; in __isatty() local
27 return __tcgetattr (fd, &term) == 0; in __isatty()
|
| /glibc-2.36/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/ |
| D | ttyname.c | 40 struct termios term; in ttyname() local
41 if (__glibc_unlikely (__tcgetattr (fd, &term) < 0)) in ttyname()
|
| D | ttyname_r.c | 117 struct termios term; in __ttyname_r() local
118 if (__glibc_unlikely (__tcgetattr (fd, &term) < 0)) in __ttyname_r()
|
| /glibc-2.36/iconv/ |
| D | iconv_charmap.c | 40 int term[256 / 8]; member
65 return tbl->term[idx / 8] & (1 << (idx % 8)); in is_term()
72 tbl->term[idx / 8] &= ~(1 << (idx % 8)); in clear_term()
79 tbl->term[idx / 8] |= 1 << (idx % 8); in set_term()
|
| /glibc-2.36/hurd/ |
| D | hurdsig.c | 624 enum { stop, ignore, core, term, handle } act; in weak_alias() enumerator
871 act = term; in weak_alias()
904 act = term; in weak_alias()
960 case term: /* Time to die. */ in weak_alias()
|
| D | Makefile | 37 term tioctl socket ifsock \
|
| /glibc-2.36/locale/programs/ |
| D | ld-address.c | 50 const char term[4]; member
214 if (strcmp (address->lang_term, iso639[cnt].term) == 0) in address_finish()
|
| /glibc-2.36/manual/ |
| D | macros.texi | 210 term\comments\
215 term\comments\
|
| D | intro.texi | 656 @item @code{term}
657 @cindex term
659 Functions marked with @code{term} as an MT-Safety issue may change the
663 with @code{term} are MT-Unsafe. The same window enables changes made by
677 Functions marked with @code{term} as an AC-Safety issue are supposed to
|
| D | io.texi | 220 Some other documents, such as the POSIX standard, use the term
|
| D | lgpl-2.1.texi | 141 included without limitation in the term ``modification''.)
|
| /glibc-2.36/localedata/locales/ |
| D | mjw_IN | 144 % Salutation valid for all females - "" (no term)
|
| D | pa_PK | 149 % Can we put in the values for a cancel exression here?? I found a term that
|
| D | ur_PK | 166 % Can we put in the values for a cancel exression here?? I found a term that
|
| D | nso_ZA | 194 % Salutation valid for all females - "" (no term)
|
| D | zu_ZA | 202 % Salutation valid for all females - "" (no term)
|
| D | ve_ZA | 204 % Salutation valid for all females - "" (no term)
|
| D | xh_ZA | 206 % Salutation valid for all females - "" (no term)
|
| D | tn_ZA | 206 % Salutation valid for all females - "" (no term)
|
| D | ss_ZA | 211 % Salutation valid for all females - "" (no term)
|
| D | nr_ZA | 206 % Salutation valid for all females - "" (no term)
|
| D | ts_ZA | 211 % Salutation valid for all females - "" (no term)
|
| D | st_ZA | 207 % Salutation valid for all females - "" (no term)
|
| D | en_ZA | 229 % (no term)
|
| /glibc-2.36/ |
| D | COPYING | 70 the term "modification".) Each licensee is addressed as "you".
|
123