Searched refs:UMSDOS_REC_SIZE (Results 1 – 6 of 6) sorted by relevance
90 entry_num = info->f_pos / UMSDOS_REC_SIZE; in umsdos_manglename()114 / UMSDOS_REC_SIZE); in umsdos_evalrecsize()116 return nbrec * UMSDOS_REC_SIZE; in umsdos_evalrecsize()127 int nbrec = size / UMSDOS_REC_SIZE; in umsdos_evalrecsize_old()128 int extra = size % UMSDOS_REC_SIZE; in umsdos_evalrecsize_old()132 return nbrec * UMSDOS_REC_SIZE; in umsdos_evalrecsize_old()508 if (!(i % UMSDOS_REC_SIZE)) { in main()
411 offs += UMSDOS_REC_SIZE; in umsdos_find()412 pos += UMSDOS_REC_SIZE; in umsdos_find()416 empty.one = pos-UMSDOS_REC_SIZE; in umsdos_find()417 empty_size += UMSDOS_REC_SIZE; in umsdos_find()
273 ret=mapping->a_ops->prepare_write(NULL,page,offs,offs+UMSDOS_REC_SIZE); in umsdos_notify_change_locked()290 ret=mapping->a_ops->commit_write(NULL,page,offs,offs+UMSDOS_REC_SIZE); in umsdos_notify_change_locked()
186 info.recsize = UMSDOS_REC_SIZE; in UMSDOS_ioctl_dir()
42 * Well, not so true. The problem, is that UMSDOS_REC_SIZE is
93 #define UMSDOS_REC_SIZE 64 macro