Searched refs:isolate_lru_page (Results 1 – 11 of 11) sorted by relevance
64 if (!isolate_lru_page(page)) { in __clear_page_mlock()86 if (!isolate_lru_page(page)) in mlock_vma_page()112 if (!isolate_lru_page(page)) { in munlock_vma_page()
45 extern int isolate_lru_page(struct page *page);
505 if (!isolate_lru_page(p)) { in delete_from_lru_cache()1463 ret = isolate_lru_page(page); in soft_offline_page()
714 ret = isolate_lru_page(page); in do_migrate_range()
1091 err = isolate_lru_page(page); in do_move_page_to_node_array()
607 if (!isolate_lru_page(page)) { in putback_lru_page()1200 int isolate_lru_page(struct page *page) in isolate_lru_page() function
2360 if (isolate_lru_page(page)) in mem_cgroup_move_parent()5029 if (isolate_lru_page(page)) in mem_cgroup_move_charge_pte_range()
1693 if (isolate_lru_page(page)) { in __collapse_huge_page_isolate()
905 if (!isolate_lru_page(page)) { in migrate_page_add()
66 calling isolate_lru_page().67 Calling isolate_lru_page increases the references to the page86 already been removed from the LRU via isolate_lru_page() and the refcount
101 where they can be found by isolate_lru_page(), we would prevent their228 using putback_lru_page() - the inverse operation to isolate_lru_page() - after259 were not migratable as isolate_lru_page() could not find them, and the LRU list350 at that time. If the isolate_lru_page() succeeds, mlock_vma_page() will put422 isolate_lru_page() could fail, in which case we couldn't try_to_munlock(). So,