Home
last modified time | relevance | path

Searched refs:operator (Results 1 – 15 of 15) sorted by relevance

/busybox-1.35.0/shell/hush_test/hush-arith/
Darith.right58 check that the unevaluated part of the ternary operator does not do evaluation or assignment
63 check precedence of assignment vs. conditional operator
65 check precedence of assignment vs. conditional operator
66 associativity of assignment-operator operator
97 hush: malformed ?: operator
Darith2.sub40 # -- is not a dec operator on non-variable, it is the - - sequence
45 # ++ is not a inc operator on non-variable, it is the + + sequence
Darith.tests94 echo check that the unevaluated part of the ternary operator does not do evaluation or assignment
115 echo check precedence of assignment vs. conditional operator
122 echo check precedence of assignment vs. conditional operator
128 echo associativity of assignment-operator operator
258 # ++ is not a inc operator on non-variable, it is the + + sequence
273 # ++ is not a inc operator on non-variable, it is the + + sequence
Darith1.sub38 # ++ is not a inc operator on non-variable, it is the + + sequence
/busybox-1.35.0/shell/ash_test/ash-arith/
Darith.right56 check that the unevaluated part of the ternary operator does not do evaluation or assignment
61 check precedence of assignment vs. conditional operator
63 check precedence of assignment vs. conditional operator
64 associativity of assignment-operator operator
95 ./arith.tests: line 196: malformed ?: operator
Darith2.sub40 # -- is not a dec operator on non-variable, it is the - - sequence
45 # ++ is not a inc operator on non-variable, it is the + + sequence
Darith.tests90 echo check that the unevaluated part of the ternary operator does not do evaluation or assignment
111 echo check precedence of assignment vs. conditional operator
118 echo check precedence of assignment vs. conditional operator
124 echo associativity of assignment-operator operator
254 # ++ is not a inc operator on non-variable, it is the + + sequence
269 # ++ is not a inc operator on non-variable, it is the + + sequence
Darith1.sub38 # ++ is not a inc operator on non-variable, it is the + + sequence
/busybox-1.35.0/shell/
Dmath.c119 typedef unsigned char operator; typedef
212 is_assign_op(operator op) in is_assign_op()
214 operator prec = PREC(op); in is_assign_op()
222 is_right_associative(operator prec) in is_right_associative()
296 arith_apply(arith_state_t *math_state, operator op, var_or_num_t *numstack, var_or_num_t **numstack… in arith_apply()
583 operator lasttok; in evaluate_string()
594 operator *const stack = alloca(expr_len * sizeof(stack[0])); in evaluate_string()
595 operator *stackptr = stack; in evaluate_string()
603 operator op; in evaluate_string()
604 operator prec; in evaluate_string()
[all …]
/busybox-1.35.0/shell/hush_test/hush-test2/
Dstrops3.tests1 # regex should accept '+' operator
/busybox-1.35.0/shell/hush_test/hush-quoting/
Ddollar_repl_slash_bash1.tests3 # * replace operator did not escape \ in replace string
/busybox-1.35.0/shell/ash_test/ash-quoting/
Ddollar_repl_slash_bash1.tests3 # * replace operator did not escape \ in replace string
/busybox-1.35.0/archival/
Ddpkg.c100 unsigned operator:4; /* was:3 */ member
336 static int test_version(const unsigned version1, const unsigned version2, const unsigned operator) in test_version() argument
339 switch (operator) { in test_version()
356 … int search_package_hashtable(const unsigned name, const unsigned version, const unsigned operator) in search_package_hashtable() argument
364 if (operator == VER_ANY) { in search_package_hashtable()
367 if (test_version(package_hashtable[probe_address]->version, version, operator)) { in search_package_hashtable()
469 edge->operator = VER_ANY; in add_split_dependencies()
480 edge->operator = VER_EQUAL; in add_split_dependencies()
482 edge->operator = VER_LESS; in add_split_dependencies()
484 edge->operator = VER_LESS_EQUAL; in add_split_dependencies()
[all …]
/busybox-1.35.0/
D.indent.pro3 --break-before-boolean-operator
/busybox-1.35.0/docs/
Dstyle-guide.txt438 The use of the "equals" (==) operator in the latter example makes it much more
440 "not" (!) operator makes it look like you are testing for an error. In a more