1Objtool
2=======
3
4The kernel CONFIG_OBJTOOL option enables a host tool named 'objtool'
5which runs at compile time.  It can do various validations and
6transformations on .o files.
7
8Objtool has become an integral part of the x86-64 kernel toolchain.  The
9kernel depends on it for a variety of security and performance features
10(and other types of features as well).
11
12
13Features
14--------
15
16Objtool has the following features:
17
18- Stack unwinding metadata validation -- useful for helping to ensure
19  stack traces are reliable for live patching
20
21- ORC unwinder metadata generation -- a faster and more precise
22  alternative to frame pointer based unwinding
23
24- Retpoline validation -- ensures that all indirect calls go through
25  retpoline thunks, for Spectre v2 mitigations
26
27- Retpoline call site annotation -- annotates all retpoline thunk call
28  sites, enabling the kernel to patch them inline, to prevent "thunk
29  funneling" for both security and performance reasons
30
31- Non-instrumentation validation -- validates non-instrumentable
32  ("noinstr") code rules, preventing instrumentation in low-level C
33  entry code
34
35- Static call annotation -- annotates static call sites, enabling the
36  kernel to implement inline static calls, a faster alternative to some
37  indirect branches
38
39- Uaccess validation -- validates uaccess rules for a proper
40  implementation of Supervisor Mode Access Protection (SMAP)
41
42- Straight Line Speculation validation -- validates certain SLS
43  mitigations
44
45- Indirect Branch Tracking validation -- validates Intel CET IBT rules
46  to ensure that all functions referenced by function pointers have
47  corresponding ENDBR instructions
48
49- Indirect Branch Tracking annotation -- annotates unused ENDBR
50  instruction sites, enabling the kernel to "seal" them (replace them
51  with NOPs) to further harden IBT
52
53- Function entry annotation -- annotates function entries, enabling
54  kernel function tracing
55
56- Other toolchain hacks which will go unmentioned at this time...
57
58Each feature can be enabled individually or in combination using the
59objtool cmdline.
60
61
62Objects
63-------
64
65Typically, objtool runs on every translation unit (TU, aka ".o file") in
66the kernel.  If a TU is part of a kernel module, the '--module' option
67is added.
68
69However:
70
71- If noinstr validation is enabled, it also runs on vmlinux.o, with all
72  options removed and '--noinstr' added.
73
74- If IBT or LTO is enabled, it doesn't run on TUs at all.  Instead it
75  runs on vmlinux.o and linked modules, with all options.
76
77In summary:
78
79  A) Legacy mode:
80             TU: objtool [--module] <options>
81        vmlinux: N/A
82         module: N/A
83
84  B) CONFIG_NOINSTR_VALIDATION=y && !(CONFIG_X86_KERNEL_IBT=y || CONFIG_LTO=y):
85             TU: objtool [--module] <options>	// no --noinstr
86        vmlinux: objtool --noinstr		// other options removed
87         module: N/A
88
89  C) CONFIG_X86_KERNEL_IBT=y || CONFIG_LTO=y:
90             TU: N/A
91        vmlinux: objtool --noinstr <options>
92         module: objtool --module --noinstr <options>
93
94
95Stack validation
96----------------
97
98Objtool's stack validation feature analyzes every .o file and ensures
99the validity of its stack metadata.  It enforces a set of rules on asm
100code and C inline assembly code so that stack traces can be reliable.
101
102For each function, it recursively follows all possible code paths and
103validates the correct frame pointer state at each instruction.
104
105It also follows code paths involving special sections, like
106.altinstructions, __jump_table, and __ex_table, which can add
107alternative execution paths to a given instruction (or set of
108instructions).  Similarly, it knows how to follow switch statements, for
109which gcc sometimes uses jump tables.
110
111Here are some of the benefits of validating stack metadata:
112
113a) More reliable stack traces for frame pointer enabled kernels
114
115   Frame pointers are used for debugging purposes.  They allow runtime
116   code and debug tools to be able to walk the stack to determine the
117   chain of function call sites that led to the currently executing
118   code.
119
120   For some architectures, frame pointers are enabled by
121   CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER.  For some other architectures they may be
122   required by the ABI (sometimes referred to as "backchain pointers").
123
124   For C code, gcc automatically generates instructions for setting up
125   frame pointers when the -fno-omit-frame-pointer option is used.
126
127   But for asm code, the frame setup instructions have to be written by
128   hand, which most people don't do.  So the end result is that
129   CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER is honored for C code but not for most asm code.
130
131   For stack traces based on frame pointers to be reliable, all
132   functions which call other functions must first create a stack frame
133   and update the frame pointer.  If a first function doesn't properly
134   create a stack frame before calling a second function, the *caller*
135   of the first function will be skipped on the stack trace.
136
137   For example, consider the following example backtrace with frame
138   pointers enabled:
139
140     [<ffffffff81812584>] dump_stack+0x4b/0x63
141     [<ffffffff812d6dc2>] cmdline_proc_show+0x12/0x30
142     [<ffffffff8127f568>] seq_read+0x108/0x3e0
143     [<ffffffff812cce62>] proc_reg_read+0x42/0x70
144     [<ffffffff81256197>] __vfs_read+0x37/0x100
145     [<ffffffff81256b16>] vfs_read+0x86/0x130
146     [<ffffffff81257898>] SyS_read+0x58/0xd0
147     [<ffffffff8181c1f2>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x76
148
149   It correctly shows that the caller of cmdline_proc_show() is
150   seq_read().
151
152   If we remove the frame pointer logic from cmdline_proc_show() by
153   replacing the frame pointer related instructions with nops, here's
154   what it looks like instead:
155
156     [<ffffffff81812584>] dump_stack+0x4b/0x63
157     [<ffffffff812d6dc2>] cmdline_proc_show+0x12/0x30
158     [<ffffffff812cce62>] proc_reg_read+0x42/0x70
159     [<ffffffff81256197>] __vfs_read+0x37/0x100
160     [<ffffffff81256b16>] vfs_read+0x86/0x130
161     [<ffffffff81257898>] SyS_read+0x58/0xd0
162     [<ffffffff8181c1f2>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x76
163
164   Notice that cmdline_proc_show()'s caller, seq_read(), has been
165   skipped.  Instead the stack trace seems to show that
166   cmdline_proc_show() was called by proc_reg_read().
167
168   The benefit of objtool here is that because it ensures that *all*
169   functions honor CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER, no functions will ever[*] be
170   skipped on a stack trace.
171
172   [*] unless an interrupt or exception has occurred at the very
173       beginning of a function before the stack frame has been created,
174       or at the very end of the function after the stack frame has been
175       destroyed.  This is an inherent limitation of frame pointers.
176
177b) ORC (Oops Rewind Capability) unwind table generation
178
179   An alternative to frame pointers and DWARF, ORC unwind data can be
180   used to walk the stack.  Unlike frame pointers, ORC data is out of
181   band.  So it doesn't affect runtime performance and it can be
182   reliable even when interrupts or exceptions are involved.
183
184   For more details, see Documentation/arch/x86/orc-unwinder.rst.
185
186c) Higher live patching compatibility rate
187
188   Livepatch has an optional "consistency model", which is needed for
189   more complex patches.  In order for the consistency model to work,
190   stack traces need to be reliable (or an unreliable condition needs to
191   be detectable).  Objtool makes that possible.
192
193   For more details, see the livepatch documentation in the Linux kernel
194   source tree at Documentation/livepatch/livepatch.rst.
195
196To achieve the validation, objtool enforces the following rules:
197
1981. Each callable function must be annotated as such with the ELF
199   function type.  In asm code, this is typically done using the
200   ENTRY/ENDPROC macros.  If objtool finds a return instruction
201   outside of a function, it flags an error since that usually indicates
202   callable code which should be annotated accordingly.
203
204   This rule is needed so that objtool can properly identify each
205   callable function in order to analyze its stack metadata.
206
2072. Conversely, each section of code which is *not* callable should *not*
208   be annotated as an ELF function.  The ENDPROC macro shouldn't be used
209   in this case.
210
211   This rule is needed so that objtool can ignore non-callable code.
212   Such code doesn't have to follow any of the other rules.
213
2143. Each callable function which calls another function must have the
215   correct frame pointer logic, if required by CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER or
216   the architecture's back chain rules.  This can by done in asm code
217   with the FRAME_BEGIN/FRAME_END macros.
218
219   This rule ensures that frame pointer based stack traces will work as
220   designed.  If function A doesn't create a stack frame before calling
221   function B, the _caller_ of function A will be skipped on the stack
222   trace.
223
2244. Dynamic jumps and jumps to undefined symbols are only allowed if:
225
226   a) the jump is part of a switch statement; or
227
228   b) the jump matches sibling call semantics and the frame pointer has
229      the same value it had on function entry.
230
231   This rule is needed so that objtool can reliably analyze all of a
232   function's code paths.  If a function jumps to code in another file,
233   and it's not a sibling call, objtool has no way to follow the jump
234   because it only analyzes a single file at a time.
235
2365. A callable function may not execute kernel entry/exit instructions.
237   The only code which needs such instructions is kernel entry code,
238   which shouldn't be be in callable functions anyway.
239
240   This rule is just a sanity check to ensure that callable functions
241   return normally.
242
243
244Objtool warnings
245----------------
246
247NOTE: When requesting help with an objtool warning, please recreate with
248OBJTOOL_VERBOSE=1 (e.g., "make OBJTOOL_VERBOSE=1") and send the full
249output, including any disassembly or backtrace below the warning, to the
250objtool maintainers.
251
252For asm files, if you're getting an error which doesn't make sense,
253first make sure that the affected code follows the above rules.
254
255For C files, the common culprits are inline asm statements and calls to
256"noreturn" functions.  See below for more details.
257
258Another possible cause for errors in C code is if the Makefile removes
259-fno-omit-frame-pointer or adds -fomit-frame-pointer to the gcc options.
260
261Here are some examples of common warnings reported by objtool, what
262they mean, and suggestions for how to fix them.  When in doubt, ping
263the objtool maintainers.
264
265
2661. file.o: warning: objtool: func()+0x128: call without frame pointer save/setup
267
268   The func() function made a function call without first saving and/or
269   updating the frame pointer, and CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER is enabled.
270
271   If the error is for an asm file, and func() is indeed a callable
272   function, add proper frame pointer logic using the FRAME_BEGIN and
273   FRAME_END macros.  Otherwise, if it's not a callable function, remove
274   its ELF function annotation by changing ENDPROC to END, and instead
275   use the manual unwind hint macros in asm/unwind_hints.h.
276
277   If it's a GCC-compiled .c file, the error may be because the function
278   uses an inline asm() statement which has a "call" instruction.  An
279   asm() statement with a call instruction must declare the use of the
280   stack pointer in its output operand.  On x86_64, this means adding
281   the ASM_CALL_CONSTRAINT as an output constraint:
282
283     asm volatile("call func" : ASM_CALL_CONSTRAINT);
284
285   Otherwise the stack frame may not get created before the call.
286
287
2882. file.o: warning: objtool: .text+0x53: unreachable instruction
289
290   Objtool couldn't find a code path to reach the instruction.
291
292   If the error is for an asm file, and the instruction is inside (or
293   reachable from) a callable function, the function should be annotated
294   with the ENTRY/ENDPROC macros (ENDPROC is the important one).
295   Otherwise, the code should probably be annotated with the unwind hint
296   macros in asm/unwind_hints.h so objtool and the unwinder can know the
297   stack state associated with the code.
298
299   If you're 100% sure the code won't affect stack traces, or if you're
300   a just a bad person, you can tell objtool to ignore it.  See the
301   "Adding exceptions" section below.
302
303   If it's not actually in a callable function (e.g. kernel entry code),
304   change ENDPROC to END.
305
3063. file.o: warning: objtool: foo+0x48c: bar() is missing a __noreturn annotation
307
308   The call from foo() to bar() doesn't return, but bar() is missing the
309   __noreturn annotation.  NOTE: In addition to annotating the function
310   with __noreturn, please also add it to tools/objtool/noreturns.h.
311
3124. file.o: warning: objtool: func(): can't find starting instruction
313   or
314   file.o: warning: objtool: func()+0x11dd: can't decode instruction
315
316   Does the file have data in a text section?  If so, that can confuse
317   objtool's instruction decoder.  Move the data to a more appropriate
318   section like .data or .rodata.
319
320
3215. file.o: warning: objtool: func()+0x6: unsupported instruction in callable function
322
323   This is a kernel entry/exit instruction like sysenter or iret.  Such
324   instructions aren't allowed in a callable function, and are most
325   likely part of the kernel entry code.  They should usually not have
326   the callable function annotation (ENDPROC) and should always be
327   annotated with the unwind hint macros in asm/unwind_hints.h.
328
329
3306. file.o: warning: objtool: func()+0x26: sibling call from callable instruction with modified stack frame
331
332   This is a dynamic jump or a jump to an undefined symbol.  Objtool
333   assumed it's a sibling call and detected that the frame pointer
334   wasn't first restored to its original state.
335
336   If it's not really a sibling call, you may need to move the
337   destination code to the local file.
338
339   If the instruction is not actually in a callable function (e.g.
340   kernel entry code), change ENDPROC to END and annotate manually with
341   the unwind hint macros in asm/unwind_hints.h.
342
343
3447. file: warning: objtool: func()+0x5c: stack state mismatch
345
346   The instruction's frame pointer state is inconsistent, depending on
347   which execution path was taken to reach the instruction.
348
349   Make sure that, when CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER is enabled, the function
350   pushes and sets up the frame pointer (for x86_64, this means rbp) at
351   the beginning of the function and pops it at the end of the function.
352   Also make sure that no other code in the function touches the frame
353   pointer.
354
355   Another possibility is that the code has some asm or inline asm which
356   does some unusual things to the stack or the frame pointer.  In such
357   cases it's probably appropriate to use the unwind hint macros in
358   asm/unwind_hints.h.
359
360
3618. file.o: warning: objtool: funcA() falls through to next function funcB()
362
363   This means that funcA() doesn't end with a return instruction or an
364   unconditional jump, and that objtool has determined that the function
365   can fall through into the next function.  There could be different
366   reasons for this:
367
368   1) funcA()'s last instruction is a call to a "noreturn" function like
369      panic().  In this case the noreturn function needs to be added to
370      objtool's hard-coded global_noreturns array.  Feel free to bug the
371      objtool maintainer, or you can submit a patch.
372
373   2) funcA() uses the unreachable() annotation in a section of code
374      that is actually reachable.
375
376   3) If funcA() calls an inline function, the object code for funcA()
377      might be corrupt due to a gcc bug.  For more details, see:
378      https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70646
379
3809. file.o: warning: objtool: funcA() call to funcB() with UACCESS enabled
381
382   This means that an unexpected call to a non-whitelisted function exists
383   outside of arch-specific guards.
384   X86: SMAP (stac/clac): __uaccess_begin()/__uaccess_end()
385   ARM: PAN: uaccess_enable()/uaccess_disable()
386
387   These functions should be called to denote a minimal critical section around
388   access to __user variables. See also: https://lwn.net/Articles/517475/
389
390   The intention of the warning is to prevent calls to funcB() from eventually
391   calling schedule(), potentially leaking the AC flags state, and not
392   restoring them correctly.
393
394   It also helps verify that there are no unexpected calls to funcB() which may
395   access user space pages with protections against doing so disabled.
396
397   To fix, either:
398   1) remove explicit calls to funcB() from funcA().
399   2) add the correct guards before and after calls to low level functions like
400      __get_user_size()/__put_user_size().
401   3) add funcB to uaccess_safe_builtin whitelist in tools/objtool/check.c, if
402      funcB obviously does not call schedule(), and is marked notrace (since
403      function tracing inserts additional calls, which is not obvious from the
404      sources).
405
40610. file.o: warning: func()+0x5c: stack layout conflict in alternatives
407
408    This means that in the use of the alternative() or ALTERNATIVE()
409    macro, the code paths have conflicting modifications to the stack.
410    The problem is that there is only one ORC unwind table, which means
411    that the ORC unwind entries must be consistent for all possible
412    instruction boundaries regardless of which code has been patched.
413    This limitation can be overcome by massaging the alternatives with
414    NOPs to shift the stack changes around so they no longer conflict.
415
41611. file.o: warning: unannotated intra-function call
417
418   This warning means that a direct call is done to a destination which
419   is not at the beginning of a function. If this is a legit call, you
420   can remove this warning by putting the ANNOTATE_INTRA_FUNCTION_CALL
421   directive right before the call.
422
42312. file.o: warning: func(): not an indirect call target
424
425   This means that objtool is running with --ibt and a function expected
426   to be an indirect call target is not. In particular, this happens for
427   init_module() or cleanup_module() if a module relies on these special
428   names and does not use module_init() / module_exit() macros to create
429   them.
430
431
432If the error doesn't seem to make sense, it could be a bug in objtool.
433Feel free to ask the objtool maintainer for help.
434
435
436Adding exceptions
437-----------------
438
439If you _really_ need objtool to ignore something, and are 100% sure
440that it won't affect kernel stack traces, you can tell objtool to
441ignore it:
442
443- To skip validation of a function, use the STACK_FRAME_NON_STANDARD
444  macro.
445
446- To skip validation of a file, add
447
448    OBJECT_FILES_NON_STANDARD_filename.o := y
449
450  to the Makefile.
451
452- To skip validation of a directory, add
453
454    OBJECT_FILES_NON_STANDARD := y
455
456  to the Makefile.
457
458NOTE: OBJECT_FILES_NON_STANDARD doesn't work for link time validation of
459vmlinux.o or a linked module.  So it should only be used for files which
460aren't linked into vmlinux or a module.
461