Lines Matching refs:accuracy

72     based upon getting good accuracy with reasonable speed.
228 The accuracy of the emulator is in almost all cases equal to or better
237 The following table compares the emulator accuracy for the sqrt(),
240 would be 64 bits. The reduced Turbo C accuracy of cos() and tan() for
243 accurate to 64 bits can result in a relative accuracy in cos() of
260 ** The accuracy for exp() and log() is low because the FPU (emulator)
274 consequence, the accuracy of these functions for large arguments has
276 FPU). There is also now no degradation of accuracy for fcos and fptan
278 definition of accuracy has changed slightly from that used for the
303 Prior to version 1.20 of the emulator, the accuracy of the results for
305 good as the results from an 80486 FPU. From version 1.20, the accuracy
313 accuracy in number of times per million, thus the second of these
314 columns shows that an accuracy of between 63.80 and 63.89 bits was
321 the worst accuracy which was found (in bits) and the approximate value
338 Tests performed on an 80486 FPU showed results of lower accuracy. The
350 result of the given accuracy in bits (given in the left-most column)
359 results of relatively poor accuracy for these instructions when the
361 accuracy of the results were less than 62 bits, which occurs quite
363 accuracy is discussed above in relation to the Turbo C "emulator", and
364 the accuracy of the value of pi.