Lines Matching refs:W

132 #W the expected result for [[:alnum:]]* is 2-7 which is wrong
135 #W the expected result for [^[:alnum:]]* is 2-5 which is wrong
138 #W the expected result for [[:alpha:]]* is 2-5 which is wrong
147 #W the expected result for [[:digit:]]* is 2-3 which is wrong
157 #W the expected result for [[:punct:]]* is 2-2 which is wrong
163 #W the expected result for [^[:space:]]* is 2-9 which is wrong
166 #W the expected result for [[:upper:]]* is 2-3 which is wrong
170 #W the expected result for [[:xdigit:]]* is 2-5 which is wrong
173 #W the expected result for [^[:xdigit:]]* is 2-7 which is wrong
237 #W POSIX does not really specify whether a\(b\)*c\1 matches acb.
238 #W back references are supposed to expand to the last match, but what
239 #W if there never was a match as in this case?
243 #W These two tests have the same problem as the test in GA135.  No match
244 #W of a subexpression, why should the back reference be usable?
245 #W 1 2 a\(b\)*c\1 acb
246 #W 4 7 a\(b\(c\(d\(f\)*\)\)\)\4|xYzabcdePQRST
268 #W the expression \(\(a\)\1\)\{1,2\} is ill-formed, using \2
277 #W the expected result for \([a-c]*\)\{2,\} is failure which isn't correct
288 #W There are numerous bugs in the original version.
294 #W the expected result for \(*\)*\1* is 2-2 which isn't correct
297 #W the expected result for \(a\(b\{1,2\}\)\{1,2\}\) is 1-5 which isn't correct
326 #W the expected result for [a-z]*$ is failure which isn't correct